Ryan Tannehill: Exploring QB Options Beyond Clifford and Pratt for the Packers

Sunday, 25 August 2024, 18:10

Ryan Tannehill offers intriguing backup quarterback possibilities as the Packers have more options than Sean Clifford and Michael Pratt. With preseason struggles evident in Green Bay's depth chart, exploration beyond rostered QBs becomes crucial. The need for reliable game experience remains paramount heading into the 2024 season.
Acmepackingcompany
Ryan Tannehill: Exploring QB Options Beyond Clifford and Pratt for the Packers

Ryan Tannehill: A Potential Backup Option

Through two preseason games, with starting quarterback Jordan Love only throwing two balls during that period, Green Bay Packers backups Sean Clifford and Michael Pratt have combined to complete 31 balls off of 52 attempts for just 252 yards, no passing touchdowns and an interception this summer.

After the Packers' 27-2 loss to the Denver Broncos, head coach Matt LaFleur made it clear that the team needed to see better production out of that unit.

Assessing Backup Candidates

What if the Packers’ 2024 backup quarterback isn’t on the roster right now, though? Each of the 32 franchises in the NFL are about to cut their 90-man rosters down to 53 players, so who is on the bubble at the quarterback position?

It’s thought that if Green Bay looks for a passer, they’ll probably seek someone with game experience, especially considering how quickly the turnaround will be from cutdowns to the international regular-season opener.

Analyzing Performance Metrics

Currently, the Packers’ backups have not met the desired passing efficiency metrics. With Pratt having an adjusted yards per attempt (AY/A) of 4.3 and Clifford sitting at 3.8, it’s clear the team is looking for improvements.

The upcoming cuts may reveal potential candidates with better performance metrics. Among these, Ryan Tannehill stands out with a career AY/A of 7.1, making him an appealing option for Green Bay if he would entertain a backup role.

Potential Trade Targets

  • Assess quarterbacks who have performed better during the preseason compared to the Packers’ current options.
  • Consider the financial implications; Packers have around $23 million in cap space to work with.
  • Monitor roster cuts closely for experienced QBs who could fill the vacancy effectively.

This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and trends from around the world. Stay informed and elevate your global perspective effortlessly.

Subscribe