Trump: Cohen's Legal Battle Against the Former President
Trump Under Fire: Cohen’s Last-Ditch Legal Effort
Michael Cohen, once a loyal lawyer for Trump, is now an outspoken critic fighting to revive a civil rights lawsuit against the former president. Cohen claims Trump retaliated against him, sending him back to prison after he authored a tell-all book. As the Supreme Court prepares to discuss Cohen's case, legal experts note the difficulties he faces under current precedents.
Examining the Legal Landscape
Cohen’s claims stem from a broader concern regarding the court's past decisions impacting civil rights claims against federal officials. The 1971 Bivens precedent, which Cohen's case references, poses a challenge for his appeal as courts have increasingly limited these types of claims.
- Cohen's lawsuit targets Trump and former Attorney General William Barr.
- Recent rulings have made it difficult to win cases against officials.
- Cohen compares his situation to those oppressed under corrupt regimes.
Cohen's Appeal and the Supreme Court's Role
Despite an uphill battle, Cohen’s efforts illustrate the ongoing ramifications of political actions by those in power. The second circuit and a federal judge previously ruled against him, but the stakes remain high as the Supreme Court considers his appeal on Oct. 18.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.