Liquefied Natural Gas: A Greater Climate Threat Than Coal

Friday, 4 October 2024, 09:12

Liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is worse for the climate than coal, according to a recent Cornell study. This research challenges the narrative that LNG serves as a 'bridge fuel' to lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Nationofchange
Liquefied Natural Gas: A Greater Climate Threat Than Coal

Overview of LNG's Climate Impact

A recent study by Cornell University demonstrates that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from the U.S. produce a larger greenhouse gas footprint than coal. This finding questions the prevalent notion that LNG is a viable alternative to fossil fuels, often touted as a 'bridge fuel' for transition to greener energy sources.

Key Findings from the Study

  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The study highlights that emissions from LNG are significantly higher, undermining its status.
  • Misleading Claims: The research illustrates that claims supporting LNG as a cleaner option do not hold up against reality.
  • Policy Implications: This data could alter energy policies and investment decisions worldwide.

This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and trends from around the world. Stay informed and elevate your global perspective effortlessly.

Subscribe