Kinetic Conflict: Unraveling the Myths Behind US-China Relations

The Flawed Democracy vs. Autocracy Narrative

First, the rhetoric of democracy vs. autocracy implies that the Communist Party of China is illegitimate absent Western-style elections. Yet, research indicates that the Communist Party’s governance is trusted by its people, outperforming many Western democracies.

Competition and Zero-Sum Thinking

Second, the United States’ competition with China, although natural, must not be tainted by a zero-sum mentality. Indiscriminate tariffs harm global supply chains and self-interest. The need for collaboration in a borderless digital age is paramount.

Shifting Alliances in a Multipolar World

Third, America’s expectation of unwavering alliances in the Asia-Pacific highlights the misconceptions of an increasingly multipolar world. Many countries aim to maintain friendships with both the US and China.

Misconceptions About Taiwan

Fourth, fears of a Chinese military assault on Taiwan are exacerbated by military countermeasures. However, much of Taiwan's population prefers the status quo, indicating that peaceful cooperation may be more beneficial.

Reality of State Capitalism in China

Fifth, the idea that China’s state capitalism stifles the private sector is inaccurate. Recent data shows robust growth in China's private sector, contributing significantly to its economy.

In a world where understanding and collaboration are vital, it is essential for US leadership—whether under Harris or Trump—to reassess these narratives to avoid a descent into kinetic conflict.