UN Stalemate at Brics Meeting: Egypt and Ethiopia Reject Joint Statement

Thursday, 26 September 2024, 13:12

UN developments took center stage as the Brics meeting ended in stalemate, with Egypt and Ethiopia rejecting a joint statement. The refusal reflects broader tensions within the group ahead of significant moves for increased membership and Security Council representation. This incident underscores the difficulties faced by the UN and Brics in achieving consensus amid geopolitical shifts.
Scmp
UN Stalemate at Brics Meeting: Egypt and Ethiopia Reject Joint Statement

Brics Meeting Ends in Stalemate

A meeting of Brics foreign ministers in New York on Thursday ended without a joint statement for the first time since the group’s founding, reflecting difficulties reaching a consensus with the addition of new members last year.

The meeting convened on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly and was expected to produce a 52-paragraph text on several issues, including the Middle East conflict, plans for a common currency, and preliminary talks on the accession of more Brics countries to the summit slated for October in Kazan, Russia.

However, according to reports from Brazilian news portal UOL, independently confirmed by the Post, the meeting ended in a stalemate. One condition set by Indian and Brazilian diplomats for the bloc’s expansion last year was that the new members support the aspirations of India, Brazil, and South Africa for permanent seats on the UN Security Council, the Brazilian website added.

Stalemate Highlights Geopolitical Tensions

At Thursday’s meeting, Egypt and Ethiopia refused to sign the communiqué mentioning the issue on the grounds no consensus had been reached regarding which country should be Africa’s representative on the UN’s highest body. Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira, who chaired Thursday’s meeting, argued that both countries understood the conditions under which they had been accepted into Brics last year.

In light of the stance taken by Egypt and Ethiopia, he decided to end the meeting. Joel Souza Pinto Sampaio, who leads Vieira’s communications team, confirmed the impasse in New York but refrained from elaborating on the meeting’s specifics. “There was no consensus here,” Sampaio told the Post. “Our sherpas will continue working to reach consensus until the summit in Kazan next month.”

Another person familiar with the matter described the situation as a serious disagreement. The Chinese and Indian missions in New York did not immediately respond to questions about the stalemate. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, New Delhi’s foreign minister, abstained from mentioning it when after the meeting he posted on X, formerly Twitter, saying the ministers “focused on reforming multilateralism and strengthening development.”

Future Implications of the Stalemate

Created as Bric in 2006 with Brazil, Russia, India, and China as its founding members, Brics has faced challenges as it expanded. Last year, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates were invited to become members with effect from January 1, 2024. Riyadh has yet to confirm its membership.

The Brics leaders’ summit, taking place from October 22 to 24, will be only the second since the group’s expansion in January. Reaching consensus on issues, however, could prove more elusive as the group of non-Western countries adds to its ranks.


This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and trends from around the world. Stay informed and elevate your global perspective effortlessly.

Subscribe