A Project 2025 Adviser Defends Slavery in Haiti: Unpacking the Outrage

Thursday, 19 September 2024, 13:49

A Project 2025 adviser sparked outrage by asserting at a congressional hearing that slavery in Haiti was a better alternative than its troubled history. This controversial stance has raised eyebrows and led to extensive public debate on colonial impacts and modern implications. As these shocking claims surface, societal response grows palpable.
Newrepublic
A Project 2025 Adviser Defends Slavery in Haiti: Unpacking the Outrage

A Project 2025 Adviser Defends Slavery in Haiti: The Backlash

During a recent congressional hearing, Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the far-right Center for Immigration Studies, made headlines by arguing that Haiti would have fared better under colonization, including slavery.

Public Reaction to the Remarks

The response from lawmakers and the public has been swift and severe, condemning any suggestion that defends slavery as a viable socio-economic condition. Critics have labeled the statements as dangerous and misleading.

  • Outcry from human rights activists
  • Statements from various lawmakers condemning the claims
  • Historical context and inaccuracies discussed

This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.

Do you want to advertise here?

Related posts


Do you want to advertise here?
Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and trends from around the world. Stay informed and elevate your global perspective effortlessly.

Subscribe