Ken Hinkley Case: Bulldogs' Appeal Against Major Payout

Friday, 13 September 2024, 01:20

Ken Hinkley remains at the center of a significant legal battle as the Western Bulldogs contest a $5.9 million payout to a survivor of abuse during domestic sports events. The Bulldogs are appealing a jury's negligence finding, arguing that they could not foresee the actions of a volunteer involved. The outcome of this case could reshape perceptions of accountability within the AFL and domestic sports leagues.
LivaRava_Trends_Default.png
Ken Hinkley Case: Bulldogs' Appeal Against Major Payout

Ken Hinkley Case Overview

The Western Bulldogs are appealing a significant jury ruling that awarded $5.9 million to a survival of child sexual abuse. The case centers around Graeme Hobbs, a former volunteer accused of abusing Adam Kneale, sparking debates within domestic sports about accountability.

Details of the Case

  • Background: Kneale suffered abuse from 1984 to 1990.
  • Court Findings: The jury found the Bulldogs negligent.
  • Appeal Arguments: The Bulldogs argue there was insufficient evidence to foresee the abuse.

Community Impact

The decision of the AFL Court of Appeal will have far-reaching implications, as it reflects on how organizations handle allegations of misconduct in domestic sports.


This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and trends from around the world. Stay informed and elevate your global perspective effortlessly.

Subscribe