Georgia Tech Ends China Partnerships Amid Military Ties Scrutiny

Friday, 6 September 2024, 15:10

Graphene development faces setbacks as Georgia Tech terminates collaborations in Tianjin and Shenzhen. This decision arises amidst Congressional scrutiny of potential military connections. The university's ties to Chinese entities linked to military advancements have raised national security alarms, leading to significant policy shifts.
Scmp
Georgia Tech Ends China Partnerships Amid Military Ties Scrutiny

Georgia Tech's Significant Shift

Georgia Tech is discontinuing its partnerships with Chinese institutions, notably Tianjin University and the Georgia Tech Shenzhen Institute (GTSI), due to concerns about military ties.

The Context Behind the Decision

This decision follows increased scrutiny from Congress regarding Georgia Tech's research collaborations with entities linked to China's military operations. In May, a Congressional letter highlighted the potential risks associated with research partnerships involving Tianjin University, which has been on the U.S. entity list since 2020 for actions detrimental to national security.

  • The House select committee on China requested a detailed account of Georgia Tech's collaborative research efforts.
  • Abbigail Tumpey, Georgia Tech's spokesperson, indicated an ongoing assessment of the university's collaborations in light of these concerns.

Impact on Current Programs

Georgia Tech has assured that approximately 300 students engaged in programs at the Shenzhen institute will have the opportunity to complete their degrees despite the dissolution of partnerships.

Technological Advances and Risks

Earlier this year, Georgia Tech announced a major breakthrough in semiconductor technology using graphene, emphasizing its potential for faster computing.

  1. The research was linked to the Tianjin International Centre for Nanoparticles and Nanosystems.
  2. The implications of these technologies encompass both civilian and military applications, intensifying the need for cautious oversight.

Responses and Future Outlook

The termination of partnerships has drawn various responses, including support from U.S. lawmakers advocating for stringent measures against foreign influence in academia. Critics emphasize the need for transparent and secure research environments to protect national interests.


This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for the most reliable and up-to-date tech news. Stay informed and elevate your tech expertise effortlessly.

Subscribe