Smartmatic vs. Newsmax: A Defamation Trial Over 2020 Election Lies
Smartmatic vs. Newsmax: The Legal Showdown
As the jury selection kicks off, Smartmatic, a voting technology firm, is set to battle right-wing cable channel Newsmax in a pivotal defamation trial. This trial, labeled a 'bet-your-company' case, examines the dire consequences of disseminating false claims regarding the 2020 election. Newsmax, having claimed its actions were protected by the First Amendment, faces the daunting prospect of proving it did not act with actual malice.
Background of the Case
- Smartmatic alleges that Newsmax aired numerous false reports that severely damaged its reputation.
- Former President Trump’s claims regarding electoral fraud directly underpin the accusations against Newsmax.
- Judge Eric Davis oversees the trial, previously known for his involvement in Fox News's controversial case.
Significance of the Trial
This trial will significantly test the boundaries of journalistic integrity and legal protections for news outlets. Legal experts emphasize that proving actual malice is a high bar for Smartmatic but not an impossible one.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.