Bitcoin Halving: The Road to a Parabolic Bull Run
Bitcoin Halving 2024: Transformative Supply Squeeze Predicted by 21Shares
The upcoming Bitcoin halving, combined with soaring ETF adoption and holder confidence, is sculpting a bullish scenario, potentially triggering a market-transforming supply squeeze.
Why the Halving Positions Bitcoin in a Parabolic Bull Run
Unlike previous cycles, this year signals a departure, fueled by growing institutional adoption and expanding use cases, painting a bullish picture for Bitcoin.
The approval and success of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have marked a historic milestone in the crypto's journey. Since their inception, Bitcoin has witnessed a substantial 60% price growth, with trading volumes reaching unprecedented highs.
The steadfast confidence of long-term Bitcoin holders, despite the market's volatility, also exemplifies the unshakeable belief in Bitcoin's value proposition.
Bitcoin ETF Holdings
The influx of institutional interest in Bitcoin ETFs has attracted over $30 billion in assets under management in two months. This surge in demand is also reflected by a record-breaking $1 billion of inflows in a single day.
Bitcoin Supply Held by Long-Term Holders
The supply held by these long-term investors remains at approximately 70% of the total circulating supply. Meanwhile, the supply held by short-term holders has surged by over 33%, further constraining available supply and hinting at an impending price surge.
If this trend persists, Bitcoin's supply side will increasingly become illiquid, laying the groundwork for a supply squeeze and the potential onset of a parabolic bull run, analysts at 21Shares concluded.
Conclusion
While acknowledging Bitcoin's inherent volatility, the current environment appears primed for a significant upward trajectory as the 2024 halving approaches. This cycle may differ from its predecessors and could usher in a new era of institutional adoption and financial recognition.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.