Auto Safety Group's New Ratings Program Shows Most Partial Driving Automation Systems Performing Poorly

Tuesday, 12 March 2024, 22:56

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) revealed that the majority of partial driving automation systems received 'poor' ratings in a recent safety evaluation. With 11 out of 14 systems performing poorly, concerns arise about the lack of safety measures and potential risks associated with automated driving. Despite the worrisome results, there is hope for improvement through adjustments and updates to enhance safety on the roads.
https://store.livarava.com/434da052-e1b4-11ee-966b-5254a2021b2b.jpe
Auto Safety Group's New Ratings Program Shows Most Partial Driving Automation Systems Performing Poorly

IIHS Auto Safety Ratings Program

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) announced that most partial driving automation systems received 'poor' ratings in their new safety ratings program.

  • The evaluation included systems from BMW, Ford, General Motors, Genesis, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Tesla, and Volvo.
  • Out of 14 systems tested, 11 were rated 'poor,' 2 were 'marginal,' and only 1 was 'acceptable.'

Concerns and Highlights

  • The auto safety group emphasized the lack of measures preventing misuse and driver distraction in current systems.
  • Experts suggest that the casual use of 'self-driving' terminology could lead to safety issues and driver complacency.

This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Get the most reliable and up-to-date financial news with our curated selections. Subscribe to our newsletter for convenient access and enhance your analytical work effortlessly.

Subscribe