BlackRock's ESG Support Experiences Significant Decline in 2023-24 Proxy Season

Wednesday, 21 August 2024, 13:08

BlackRock's support for ESG shareholder proposals has hit a record low, with only 4% of proposals receiving backing in the 2023-24 proxy season. This sharp decline follows mounting political pressure and criticism from multiple factions regarding its stance on environmental and social issues.
LivaRava_Finance_Default_1.png
BlackRock's ESG Support Experiences Significant Decline in 2023-24 Proxy Season

BlackRock's Diminished ESG Support

In a telling shift, BlackRock's backing for ESG initiatives has seen a dramatic drop, supporting just 20 out of 493 shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters, representing only 4% of proposals during the 2023-24 proxy season. The company's support peaked at 47% in 2021, revealing a troubling trend towards skepticism amidst rising political tensions.

Political Pressure and Internal Challenges

This decline has occurred as BlackRock faces backlash from both conservative and liberal groups. Critics on the left argue that the firm has not enforced sufficient action towards decarbonization, while conservatives accuse it of engaging in 'woke capitalism.' Joud Abdel Majeid, head of investment stewardship, noted that many proposals were overly prescriptive and lacked material merit.

Voting Patterns and Implications

  • BlackRock voted against 88 conservative-led anti-ESG resolutions, impacting overall corporate responses.
  • The firm supported 21% of governance proposals, up from 11% last year.
  • The median support for ESG proposals has drastically lagged, with Russell 3000 companies averaging only 18%.

Global Engagement

Despite these challenges, BlackRock's global backing for company proposals remains robust, supporting 88% of them, including major votes related to executive compensation. This demonstrates its strategic focus even as its direct support for ESG issues falters.


This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Get the most reliable and up-to-date financial news with our curated selections. Subscribe to our newsletter for convenient access and enhance your analytical work effortlessly.

Subscribe