Public Interest at Stake: Judge Criticizes Delay in San Tin Technopole Legal Aid Decision

Hong Kong Judge Highlights Public Interest in Environmental Impact Assessment

A Hong Kong judge has expressed his frustration with the Legal Aid Department regarding the delay in deciding on Eddie Tse Sai-kit's legal aid application for a judicial review related to the San Tin Technopole project. Mr. Justice Russell Coleman noted the case's significance, stating that it necessitates prompt action due to its public interest.

Delayed Legal Aid Application

During the court proceedings, Tse argued for a proficient timeline, citing the prolonged wait for a decision from the Legal Aid Department since August. He faced uncertainty as the delay could hinder the advancement of critical environmental concerns linked to the project.

Judge's Insights and Expectations

• Judge Coleman urged the Director of Legal Aid to expedite the application process, highlighting its public interest value.
• The delay has left Tse and his legal team in an opaque situation, complicating their ability to present expert evidence by critical deadlines.

Moreover, the judge criticized a communication from Emily Ho, stating that it trivialized the urgency of the legal aid decision. It is essential for all parties involved, including the Director of Environmental Protection and the Director of Civil Engineering and Development, to have clarity moving forward.

As Tse, representing the Save Lantau Alliance, aims to challenge the approval of the environmental impact assessment, public consultation is deemed a key factor in addressing the legality of the expansion project.