Harris's Trade Policies Could Spell Trouble for American Producers and Consumers

Harris's Troubling Trade Record

Harris's trade policies create a concerning landscape for American producers and consumers. Her commitment to raising taxes, implementing Venezuelan-style price controls, and further restricting America’s energy production position her as a significant risk to working families.

Impacts of Ineffective Trade Strategies

The current administration's lack of effective trade strategies has undercut American agricultural exporters. While trying to promote vague notions of “joy”, Harris has failed to provide concrete solutions to bolstering trade agreements that could enhance American interests.

A Closer Look at USMCA

• The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) was critical for expanding market access.
• Harris's recorded opposition to USMCA raises questions about her approach to modernizing trade.
• Despite bipartisan support, her votes signal a preference for outdated trade frameworks like NAFTA.

Future Implications for Agriculture

The current agricultural trade deficit, driven by the Biden-Harris administration’s inaction, is a direct threat to American farmers. In fiscal 2025, this projected deficit is expected to soar to $42.5 billion.

1. Failure to enforce previous agreements has compounded these issues.
2. Harris’s LNG export application cancellations jeopardize energy independence.
3. If elected, she is likely to maintain an anti-export position detrimental to American interests.

Political Consequences of Trade Decisions

American consumers and producers need a leader focused on their best interests rather than an agenda influenced by climate activists. Harris's potential presidency could mean further adversities for U.S. trade policies.