UnitedHealth, CVS, Cigna Accuse FTC Chair Khan of Serious Bias Against PBMs

Wednesday, 9 October 2024, 15:55

UnitedHealth, CVS, and Cigna accuse FTC Chair Khan of serious bias against Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs). This ongoing conflict raises questions about regulatory fairness and the impact on healthcare pricing. The stakes for the pharmaceutical industry are high, as the potential consequences of this case could reshape market practices and regulations.
Seekingalpha
UnitedHealth, CVS, Cigna Accuse FTC Chair Khan of Serious Bias Against PBMs

Allegations of Bias Against PBMs

UnitedHealth, CVS, and Cigna have come forward, raising accusations against FTC Chair Khan for exhibiting serious bias against Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs). They are requesting that FTC commissioners recuse themselves from the ongoing case, arguing that this bias could impede a fair outcome.

The Stakes for Healthcare Regulations

This confrontation highlights significant concerns regarding the regulation of the healthcare sector and the implications for pharmaceutical pricing. As the scrutiny over PBMs continues to grow, the underlying issues of market dynamics and healthcare costs remain pivotal for stakeholders.

Key Moments

  • UnitedHealth's Intervention: UnitedHealth's strong stance emphasizes their position in the pharmaceutical landscape.
  • CVS Health's Support: CVS adds weight to the claims, signaling a collective urgency among major players.
  • Cigna's Participation: Cigna’s involvement underscores the broad implications for PBMs in regulatory discussions.

This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Get the most reliable and up-to-date financial news with our curated selections. Subscribe to our newsletter for convenient access and enhance your analytical work effortlessly.

Subscribe