Liquefied Natural Gas and Its Greater Climate Impact Compared to Coal
The Climate Impact of Liquefied Natural Gas
Recent research from Cornell University has unearthed shocking evidence regarding liquefied natural gas (LNG). This study shows that LNG has a greater greenhouse gas footprint than coal, directly contradicting assertions that LNG serves as a 'bridge fuel' in the fight against climate change.
Understanding the Implications
This finding raises critical questions about the viability of LNG in climate goals and the environmental strategies of the U.S. If LNG is indeed more harmful, the reliance on this resource may need to be reevaluated.
Key Findings of the Study
- LNG exports from the U.S. contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.
- Investments in cleaner alternatives may be required sooner than previously thought.
- Regulatory frameworks around LNG need to be reconsidered based on these results.
For more detailed insights and to understand the broader implications for energy policy, please visit the source.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.