Liquefied Natural Gas and Its Greater Climate Impact Compared to Coal

Friday, 4 October 2024, 09:12

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is found to have a worse climate impact than coal, according to a recent Cornell study. The study challenges long-held beliefs about LNG as a 'bridge fuel' in the transition to cleaner energy sources. It has significantly raised concerns about the sustainability of LNG exports from the U.S.
Nationofchange
Liquefied Natural Gas and Its Greater Climate Impact Compared to Coal

The Climate Impact of Liquefied Natural Gas

Recent research from Cornell University has unearthed shocking evidence regarding liquefied natural gas (LNG). This study shows that LNG has a greater greenhouse gas footprint than coal, directly contradicting assertions that LNG serves as a 'bridge fuel' in the fight against climate change.

Understanding the Implications

This finding raises critical questions about the viability of LNG in climate goals and the environmental strategies of the U.S. If LNG is indeed more harmful, the reliance on this resource may need to be reevaluated.

Key Findings of the Study

  • LNG exports from the U.S. contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Investments in cleaner alternatives may be required sooner than previously thought.
  • Regulatory frameworks around LNG need to be reconsidered based on these results.

For more detailed insights and to understand the broader implications for energy policy, please visit the source.


This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Get the most reliable and up-to-date financial news with our curated selections. Subscribe to our newsletter for convenient access and enhance your analytical work effortlessly.

Subscribe