Finding the Balance: Protecting the Dual-Banking System in Stablecoin Legislation

Monday, 29 April 2024, 13:43

The potential impact of the Lummis-Gillibrand stablecoin bill is the subject of debate as it navigates the issue of state versus federal control. Authors at the Cato Institute warn against centralized control that may limit entities issuing digital assets, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach in legislation.
https://store.livarava.com/d534211f-062e-11ef-a6c0-63e1980711b2.jpg
Finding the Balance: Protecting the Dual-Banking System in Stablecoin Legislation

Debate over Stablecoin Legislation

The Lummis-Gillibrand stablecoin bill has sparked discussions regarding the balance between federal and state authority in regulating digital assets.

Centralized Control Concerns

  • Important digital assets
  • The bill tilts towards federal control, potentially impacting state regulation.

Authors at the Cato Institute, Jack Solowey and Jennifer J. Schulp, caution against giving excessive power to Washington in determining stablecoin issuers.

It is essential to respect the dual-banking system while setting regulations for stablecoin issuers.


This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.


Related posts


Newsletter

Get the most reliable and up-to-date financial news with our curated selections. Subscribe to our newsletter for convenient access and enhance your analytical work effortlessly.

Subscribe