WazirX Hack: Liminal's Platform Not Responsible for $230 Mn Exploit
WazirX Hack Investigation Unfolds
B2C exchanges are under serious scrutiny as Liminal claims innocence regarding the $230 Mn exploit linked to WazirX. Hired forensic specialists from Grant Thornton conducted an extensive audit of Liminal's infrastructure, including both frontend and backend systems. The results indicated a 'mismatch' between the data provided and that received from WazirX’s systems. This discrepancy raises questions about where the real compromise occurred.
Liminal's Findings
Despite the findings of a potential compromise, Liminal's report found no evidence of any vulnerabilities within its transaction workflow. They reinforced that their self-custody wallet infrastructure only initiates transactions from client-end applications, asserting that they cannot initiate transactions themselves.
The Back-and-Forth Between WazirX and Liminal
This back-and-forth blame game has left users and investors anxious. A prior statement from WazirX indicated concerns about a 'discrepancy' in the data being displayed, further complicating the narrative around responsibility for this high-profile hack. Recent action by WazirX to sever ties with Liminal only adds to the uncertainty, amidst ongoing investigations and looming legal ramifications.
Current Developments
- WazirX is restructuring and seeking financial support after the hack.
- Liminal continues to assert their innocence as investigations by Mandiant remain inconclusive.
- CoinSwitch has threatened legal action against WazirX to reclaim lost funds.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.