Dogecoin (DOGE) Analysis: An In-Depth Look at Meme Coin Trends
Current Market Overview
Dogecoin, a leading meme coin, has once again struggled to break out of its trading range. The crypto asset has tried to rally above its horizontal resistance line for the third time this month but continues to face selling pressure. This has occurred despite a broader market recovery and a decrease in selling activity from DOGE traders.
Reasons for Resistance
Dogecoin Paper Hands Keep Its Price At Bay Dogecoin has traded within a horizontal channel since August 4. The balance between buying and selling pressures has kept its price range-bound for over 30 days. The upper line of this channel sets resistance at $0.11, while the lower line provides support at $0.09. Last weekend, DOGE made its third attempt in seven weeks to break above the resistance. However, increased selling pressure at that level caused the attempt to fail.
Large Holders' Accumulation
Despite improvements in the broader crypto market and fewer sell-offs from DOGE traders, this resistance remains intact. Notably, DOGE whales have increased their accumulation over the past month, as seen in the rising netflow of large holders. Large holders are addresses that hold more than 0.1% of an asset's circulating supply. DOGE's large holders’ netflow, which measures the difference between the number of coins its whales have bought and sold over a specific period, has surged by 179% in the past month, signaling a notable spike in accumulation among this cohort of holders.
Retail Traders’ Sentiment
However, Dogecoin’s sideways price movement has left retail traders unimpressed. While DOGE whales have increased their accumulation, retail traders—those holding coins for less than 30 days—have sold off part of their holdings over the past month. Although on-chain data shows that the balance held by these traders has dropped by only 2%, this shift is significant because these dynamics impact market sentiment.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.